Microsoft skips patch for PowerPoint add-on
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:18Microsoft fixed eight flaws in Windows and Office Tuesday, but passed on patching one Windows component because it cannot be automatically updated.
The eight bugs patched today were far from the near-record 26 that Microsoft fixed last month when it delivered 13 security updates. Both of Tuesday’s bulletins were ranked “important,” the second-highest rating in Microsoft’s four-step severity scoring system, even though the company acknowledged that the eight vulnerabilities could be used to completely compromise a Windows PC.
[ InfoWorld's Roger Grimes explains how to stop data leaks in an enlightening 30-minute Webcast, Data Loss Prevention, which covers the tools and techniques used by experienced security pros. ]
Although security experts recommended that users deploy the Office fix first, several argued today that the Windows update was more interesting because Microsoft declined to patch one of the two pieces of involved software.
MS10-016 fixes a single flaw in Windows Movie Maker, a consumer-grade video editor bundled with Windows Vista, and available as a separate download for users of Windows XP and Windows 7 . Hackers could exploit the bug and hijack the PC by duping users into opening a malicious Movie Maker project file, which uses the “.mswmm” file extension.
While Microsoft patched Movie Maker, it passed over Producer 2003, a downloadable add-on for PowerPoint 2002 and PowerPoint 2003 that allows those presentation makers to play .mswmm files.
Jerry Bryant, a senior manager for the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), and the group’s usual spokesman, explained why the company didn’t patch Producer 2003. “Our standard approach is to produce updates that can be deployed automatically for all affected products at the same time, but Producer 2003 does not offer a means for automatic update,” he said in an entry on the MSRC blog today.
Security researchers took stabs at why Microsoft didn’t patch Producer 2003.
“Someone made a strategic decision,” said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Network Security. “Maybe because not enough people use the product to warrant a full release cycle.”
Sheldon Malm, the senior director of security strategy at Rapid7, had a different explanation. “They generally just don’t ignore a vulnerability , so I think it’s likely that the vulnerability and the patch touched other pieces of code,” said Malm, who added that if that was indeed the case, Microsoft would want to spend more time testing before it issued a fix — especially since it involves PowerPoint, a widely-used program in businesses. “There’s the possibility that they will release a patch later,” he said. “It may depend on whether there’s a public outcry.”
